Socially Responsible Banking ordinance


3 Comments (Leave Comment)

socially responsible bankingOn Wednesday, July 17, we’ll have a briefing and discussion of legislation I am sponsoring to incorporate principles of social responsibility into Seattle’s banking practices. The briefing will be in the Government Performance and Finance Committee.

The legislation, Council Bill 117845, is the result of my collaboration with the Department of Finance and Administrative Services (FAS) and the Mayor’s office.

The legislation states that FAS will use criteria of social responsibility in selecting depositories for city money, and establishes that socially responsible banking performance be a factor worth at least 15% of the total point value in determining the winning bid.

The ordinance has three main areas.

First of all, it establishes socially responsible banking bid criteria that include, but are not limited to, community involvement and reinvestment; meeting community banking needs; supporting small business lending and community development; providing for home ownership and consumer credit; assisting distressed homeowners; and allowing for products and services that are advantageous for the City and its residents.

Second, there is a statement of tasks that requires work on progress in community involvement and reinvestment, community banking needs, small business lending, and home ownership and consumer credit.

Third, it requires reporting information about residential lending, small business lending, community development loans and investing, and consumer loan data. Examples include reporting on modifications of distressed loans, small business loans by zip code, and loans for women and minority-owned businesses citywide.

Background:

The City faces limits on what it can do regarding banking, stemming from state law. State law requires banks have collateral equal to the City’s aggregated deposits (historically, the city has used a $1.1 billion figure).  In addition, state law limits city deposits in credit unions to $250,000. Because of these rules, using a small bank or credit union for city banking services—as some constituents requested—isn’t viable.

This is a common dilemma for cities across the country. Cities such as Cleveland and Philadelphia have established programs for social responsibility in banking; New York, LA and Pittsburgh passed laws in 2012.

A vote on the ordinance could come next month.

Background on earlier work on socially responsible banking is available in UP #329.

Keep in touch…

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post |

Comment from Dennis Ortblad
Time July 16, 2013 at 2:09 pm

Council Member Nick Licata: Thank you for this step towards imposing responsibilities on the institutons that the city uses for depositing our city’s tax and other revenues.

Unfortunately I won’t be able to attend your hearing on July 17. But I will follow your bill’s progress.

Dennis Ortblad (I spoke with you during your appearance at the Couth Buzzard in Greenwood.)

Comment from Heather Hudson
Time August 8, 2013 at 6:27 pm

The link to the bill is not working!

Comment from Bill Lavelle
Time August 11, 2013 at 8:20 pm

Councilmember Licata,

Thank you for introducing Seattle City Council Bill No. 117845 on Socially Responsible Banking. Because the frequency and start date of the reports required by the legislation are not specified, I am requesting that the bill be amended to require reports at a specific interval (half-yearly?) beginning in January 2014 with the performance of the current Wall Street or possibly new bank contractor, either by the contractor or FAS if the existing contractor is unwilling to do so before their contract expires.

Can you report here when the current bank service contract began and when it expires? And who holds the contract?

Leave a comment