Councilmember Licata left office on January 1, 2016.
This website is for archival purposes only, and is no longer updated.


King County Health Inequities Trends

2 Comments (Leave Comment)

Dr. David Fleming, the Director of the Seattle-King County Department of Public Health came to my Housing, Human Services, Health, and Culture (HHSHC) Committee today to report on recent trends in the health of residents in King County, with a focus on health inequities.  There were several surprising findings.

  • In most countries there is a link between health and economic well-being, yet the U.S. is falling behind despite spending a lot more per capita on health than any other country.  Of 34 countries, the US ranks 27th on life expectancy (i.e., 8th from the bottom).
  • The good news is that if King County were a country, it would rank 7thout of 34 on  that same list.
  • The bad news for King County is that in 7 of 10 measures of economic and health risk (e.g. poverty, smoking, and obesity), King County ranks among the top 5 of 15 largest counties in the US in greatest disparities by race.
  •  Two reasons for this disparity in King County is that a. more affluent residents are increasing their physical separation from lower income residents and b. the communities in which one can afford to live have different features that contribute to health.  For instance, in South Seattle there are two fast food restaurants and two tobacco stores for every 1,000 residents, while in Woodinville there is one fast food restaurant and one tobacco store for every 2,000 residents.
  • Of the successes in improved health for King County residents resulting from public health programs, on average, people of color, lower income and lower educational attainment often don’t release equal health outcomes.

Economic development and policy changes are tools policymakers need to use to improve health.  But an important point that Dr. Fleming drove home is that while it’s true that we have an opportunity in King County to make a difference, in order to do so, we really need to do things differently.

Data are available on Public Health’s Community Health Indicators website (

Keep in touch…


Share Button


RSS feed for comments on this post |

Comment from Desiree
Time April 11, 2012 at 6:13 pm

It’s not quite that simple on the food. Poorer people are more likely to afford cheaper food (such as fast food) and they’re less likely to have transportation. We’re also more likely to have trouble with access to grocery stores (or to full featured grocery stores) and the transportation issue, where it impacts individuals and families, only makes it harder to get further distances to other stores with better selections. Also, people living in poverty may face a disability or be having more trouble with a disability which just further complicates matters (and brings us back to need for better access to transportation and to health care). Just a few things observed from ground level.

Comment from Miguel
Time April 13, 2012 at 8:58 am

The truth is that unfortunately so, health goes with money, more money better greeting. Greetings to all.

Leave a comment

You need to login to post comments!